Wednesday, August 20, 2014
Sunday, August 17, 2014
In Favor of Kids and Their Cochlear Implants
The tax warriors are at it again, and this
time it’s personal. We have an eight-year-old daughter who was born deaf and has two
cochlear implants which allow her to hear. The reason she has these implants
and the necessary technical support that goes with them is that we have fought,
fought, fought our insurance providers over their attempts to classify cochlear
implants as “hearing aids” and therefore not medically-necessary and therefore
none of their concern. They are, of course, correct. Health insurance providers
are concerned with making maximum profits, not with childrens’ health. Duh. But
that’s the system that’s been forced on us and our kids and trying to wriggle
out of their ethical responsibility to cover cochlear implants (a relatively
new technology to Pleistocene-era insurance executives who have a tendency
towards cannabalism) has been common-scheme robbery for them for a couple
decades.
Now it appears that Medicare and Medicaid
bureaucrats are feeling the political clout of this hopefully-soon-to-be-extinct species, executes mafiosus, and are giving this
sham a try themselves. “In Order To Save Money” (makes you want to kneel down a
pray just thinking about it, doesn’t it?) This proposed rule change, to declare
certain cochlear implants “medically unnecessary”, would make this technology
that should be as universally accessable as cell phones virtually inaccessible to most deaf
and hard of hearing kids who depend on Medicare and Medicaid for their
healthcare needs.
Yes, I’m overreacting, and no, I don’t have
all the factoids right at the tip of my brain ready to do battle with some
corporate shill. But anger is a legitimate response to the barrage of crap
these bastards keep throwing at us in the name of “austerity for the poor” and
below’s all you need to effectively broadside them with your public comment
about how they spend your public
dollars! A relatively-technical but far-reaching issue like this probably
doesn’t get too much response from an unaware public, so even a handful of aware
responses could make a difference. My goal is to generate ten.
Please take a minute and visit helpnowhearalways.com and use their link CMS' comment
site and ask CMS to reject rule change #CMS-1640-P. Pass it on.
My Comments
to the Center for Medicaire/Medicaid Services (CMS)
“Regarding CMS-1640-P: My eight-year-old
daughter has two cochlear implants and, because of that, can hear. We had to
fight, fight, fight with our (various) insurance providers to force them to
admit that cochlear implants are not superficial "hearing aids" and
therefore not in need of their coverage. I see this proposed rule-change as yet
another example of the heartless heavy hand of a soulless industry that should
have been banished in 2009 in favor of Medicare-for-all/ Universal coverage, a
solution to this despicable healthcare train wreck we suffer under that a large
majority of American taxpayers still favor. If you adopt this rule-change, our
daughter will suffer, we will suffer and thousands of kids born deaf will never
get the chance to hear because their parents simply can't afford this
readily-available technology.
As always, the "tax warriors" who
wish to impose restrictions like these on citizens favor political expediency
over reality and I, as the parent of a deaf child, am getting heartily sick of
it! If taxpayers are the only concern in this rule change, as it must be
because the kids sure aren't, please consider how much more money it's going to
cost to keep thousands of lower-income kids deaf.
Medicare and Medicaid managers: Do your jobs!
Quit wasting time and resources with this political pandering to the Crazy
Right. Why are you forcing parents like us , who clearly have enough on our
plates due to all the local tax-warrioring in our school districts that provide
little to no services to our child in order to "save money", to even
comment on this nonsense. It's a no-brainer. You work for us and you owe it to the
kids to reject this see-through rule change.”
Friday, August 15, 2014
An Antidote
Funk
and Wagnalls Logo
Bigotry
Bigotry has not the
capacity.
Superstition the knowledge or discipline.
Fanatics have not the patience.
Intolerance the disposition.
SpinSuperstition the knowledge or discipline.
Fanatics have not the patience.
Intolerance the disposition.
“To draw out and
twist…
To extrude…
To whirl or cause
to whirl rapidly…
A downward spiral
motion.”
I found my old Funk and Wagnalls set in the early eighties at the Missoula dump (as “sanitary landfills” were known in those far-off times). The old guy who leased his land to the city was still allowed to be there in those days, his portable shack stationed at the entrance of whatever fill site was currently being used. Everyone entering the dump was required to pass his inspection before they entered so that he could high-grade their pile of obsolete or broken consumer crap and pull out the still-useable nuggets, which he’d display on the dirt around the shack in the tradition of an open-air flea market, a moveable feast, now extinct.
Paraphrased definitions from a 1946 Funk and
Wagnalls’ Dictionary
When definitions get out of hand --as they
surely have these days--when public information becomes less and less so and
you have a yearning to recall the sound of reality—as you should—I recommend
you find yourself an old dictionary. They are so valuable at countering today’s
corporate spin that if the spinmeisters were doing their jobs correctly—which,
despite what they constantly tell you, they’re not—we would be bombarded with
idiotic messages that old dictionaries are the seditious documents that they
are. In fact, by merely taking a rough sampling of our cumulative public
discourse and observing its general trajectory, I have no choice but to conclude
that things will get so out of hand that our plutocrats and their
hirelings will soon find it necessary to locate all remaining “hard copies” of
this damning evidence and burn them. That's why I'm posting some of my favorite definitions ahead of time. You can't burn cyberspace...can you?
I found my old Funk and Wagnalls set in the early eighties at the Missoula dump (as “sanitary landfills” were known in those far-off times). The old guy who leased his land to the city was still allowed to be there in those days, his portable shack stationed at the entrance of whatever fill site was currently being used. Everyone entering the dump was required to pass his inspection before they entered so that he could high-grade their pile of obsolete or broken consumer crap and pull out the still-useable nuggets, which he’d display on the dirt around the shack in the tradition of an open-air flea market, a moveable feast, now extinct.
I forget what I brought up that day—probably
a small pile of unredeemable consumer crap--but I remember it was drizzling,
and after the old guy gave my pile the nod I parked my van and perused the
goodies like I always did when I visited the dump, and there, in the rain and
dirt, I found my two-volume set of Funk and Wagnalls’ NEW PRACTICAL STANDARD
DICTIONARY. They were still in pretty good condition and, after
over thirty years of nearly constant use, they’re still in good enough shape
for an old guy to pull out of someone’s unwanted pile of refuse and set aside
for a another pass at Being Useful.
America’s Depression-era generation, which this Gatekeeper of Knowledge was a member of, was just
emerging from World War Two in 1946 when the volumes were published, and the word “hubris” wasn’t in
common use then, because it isn’t in my old Funk and Wagnalls. But it was hubris
that put the volumes in the dirt and drizzle there for me to find, and
subsequently to endlessly peruse and to cherish as I chased down an old-time
thread of a word as though I were reading my grandparents’ minds--which I am. Isn’t it funny?
I sleuth Depression-era insights out of my volumes, along with their antonyms and synonyms which, if you give them enough time, put any e-thesaurus to shame. The lack of definitions for words like hubris only
serves to speak volume about that over-serious word and about our over-serious
selves. It’s no exaggeration to say that I have loved and used this two-volume
set of old books more than any other hundred books in my personal library. They’ve helped shaped my
thought. Why not? You gotta start somewhere, and I, for lack of a better
imagination, am starting in 1946.
Think about melting ice caps and the rare-earth minerals now available for exploitation below what by worldly rights should have remained the stomping grounds for polar bears and penguins. Think about Newspeak and the language-o-cide of our tweety techno-spin
world we have created for ourselves and have forced our youth to come to terms
with. Think about how they’re messing with words these days, horribly
so. Isn't it important to draw a baseline in the sand before the whole English
language, perhaps our only recourse to counter the P.R. gibberish emitting from a billion cyber-gizmos, gets washed out to sea with
the rising shorelines?
An old dictionary is the antidote
to the ballyhooing bastards. I rank an old dictionary on the top-tier among our most
valuable, ubiquitous and readily-obtainable historical records of what our
society used to think, rather than what some seabed-mining monster who bears a striking resemblance to Godzilla or a Koch brother wants you to believe they thought. An old dictionary is usually heavy enough to serve as an anchor, if nothing else. Try anchoring yourself to an “app”.
Anyone who makes their money selling souls by
bastardizing language should fear an old dictionary. Think what you want but,
please, think.
Note: It appears this website has deemed it proper or proprietary to make it difficult to post photos anymore, even ones I have taken myself. I suppose I'll have to figure it out, and maybe there's an innocent-enough techno-explanation. But don't you think this copyright mania has been carried to culture-killing extremes? The bastards...
Tuesday, August 12, 2014
Guy M. Brandborg (left), Nez Perce Forest, 1930s
"No more fine words. No more nifty websites.
Hard deeds. Now.” Bill McKibben
All
who seek to heel the wounds inflicted on the Land by our species
Evolve.
Passively
or with hearts purple in anger
You
have to know
The
reason why so little progress has been made.
There
is a spot in your head that—You!--are not using yet.
It
must be activated now.
Nobody
knows what or where that little spot is
Anymore
than the whole combined world of scientists
Knows
of the existence of 90% of the species on this Earth
Let
alone the name given to them by Catholic.
For
the sake of argument
Let’s
call it a bit of fat with nerve endings
Or
religion
Who
cares?
Just
dig
Until
you find your way
And
then
Figure
out the thousand other ways
To
give directions to the one in a thousand
who
will give a damn.
because
remember:
only
one in a thousand
will
give a damn
And
that's all that's needed
From
us
Now!
To merely seek the end of a Thousand Paths
where
the stone in the creek lies just right
at
the crossing
to
be worth the first step across.
Stretch
your brain goddamit!
Is
all I’m saying.
How
else do you think we made it to this sorry point to begin with?
It's
been done before
and
is not Rocket Science
And
by the way
There’s
nothing worse
Than
a conceited monkey
Don’t
you agree?
Evolve,
my friends.
Why not?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)